Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0496

reference
154-tree-1
name
0496
tree-preservation-order

undefined

154-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.006401 50.852549)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.006288 50.852537,-1.006293 50.852560,-1.006308 50.852580,-1.006333 50.852596,-1.006365 50.852606,-1.006400 50.852610,-1.006435 50.852607,-1.006467 50.852597,-1.006492 50.852581,-1.006509 50.852561,-1.006515 50.852539,-1.006510 50.852517,-1.006494 50.852497,-1.006469 50.852481,-1.006438 50.852470,-1.006403 50.852466,-1.006368 50.852470,-1.006336 50.852480,-1.006310 50.852495,-1.006294 50.852515,-1.006288 50.852537)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL